This so-called foray into the Red and Blue America has been making the rounds lately, noted here, somewhat impugned here, and very rightly mocked over yonder.
Well, count me in on Bryan's mockery, which is first worth just quoting:
Actually going into the heart of Red Country would have meant going to certain regions of Texas, or plenty of other states, where I'm certain he'd have risked being pulled over on a back road and been made to feel a lot less comfortable than he did after being halfheartedly called an asshole by some vegan in a coffee shop. Trust me on this one. Or rent Easy Rider.Exactly. The hack at the helm of this piece clearly couldn't be bothered to venture outside his Southern California cocoon, and the two places he bothered to poke his lil nose into strike me as downright moderate:
My journey to Red America carries me to the antipodes of today's Republicanism.Antipodes? In California? You gotta be kidding me. Let's see what they are.
I first visit Newport Beach, Orange County's last bastion of wealthy white country-club Republicans (population, 70,032; 94 percent white; 61.6 percent registered Republican; median household income $111,166).Pull over. Yes, this may be the last bastion of wealthy Republicans in Orange County. Yes, 61.6% affiliation with the G.O.P. is something like double the national average.
But let's see how Newport Beach stacks up against some real Red Country. And party registration is cheap. Money talks. So let's talk money. Among the four-odd Newport Beach zip codes, individual donations to George Bush's campaign this year have totaled $511,575 (73%). (Source: Color of Money; look up 92657, -660, -661, and -662.) That is a fair drubbing of the Dem's fundraising there -- $190,300 (27%). {Note: in all zip codes I looked at, 3rd party candidate contributions were too small to factor in.}
But this disparity looks downright modest in comparison to the sort of numbers you see in actual Red Country. Take, e.g., the breakdown of political donations in a single zip code in central Houston, Texas: Individual donations to Bush total $816,556 (86%), to the Dems' measly $133,636 (14%). The numbers get even more red when you hit hoity-toit suburbs like the Woodlands (zips 77382 & -384), where Bush beat the Dems $47,235 (91%) to $4,900 (9%). That, my little Angeleno, is a bastion of wealthy Republicans. But onward; our intrepid reporter has another nearby "antipode" to explore.
I then travel to Bakersfield, the heart of California's agricultural Central Valley two hours northeast of Los Angeles (population 247,057; 69 percent white and 29.4 percent Hispanic; 49.2 percent registered Republican; median household income $39,468). To give you a sense of the lion's den I was entering: In 2000, Bakersfield voted 60.8 percent Republican versus 41 percent statewide.My, that's some lion's den. I hope you're packing heat and have the ACLU on speed dial, you miserable little creep -- they may well throw you in the hoosegow while they rustle up a lynchin' mob! For the love of God, at least get out of Southern California. Ever heard of the State of Jefferson? It's not perfect Red Country, but in a pinch it's at least better than Bakersfield.
But if you really want to impress me, keep heading north east until you find yourself in the Oregon outback. Does a 60% showing for Bush really blow your little Venice Beach mind? Check out Malheur County, which went 73% for Bush in 2000, 22% for Gore. Try Harney: 75% to 21%. Wander over to Lake: 76% to 19%.
And finish up your tour, if you make it that far, in charming little Grant County, where 3,078 of the 3,846 hardbitten ranchin' folk cast their vote for Bush, a mere 589 for Gore. 80% to 15%. That, you lazy, craven doofus, is Red Country.
Also FLOGged at the OC.
{He leans back, spent, and wonders why he spent so much time on that post? That article musta really pissed him off. That, and he's simply fed up with the Uniform Commercial Code. Oh, for the days of illusory promises and Pareto efficiencies. The devil of boredom is in the details.}
Posted by FLOG at October 28, 2004 1:54 PMGive the guy a break. This wasn't a Black Like Me-style epic or an investigative report for the New York Times. It was a quickly written piece for an online magazine. He probably didn't have the time or budget to travel into those blood-red areas and was probably back $3.50 for it. Ya' gotta consider the context. It was the journalistic equivalent of a lark.
Yes, that's my new favorite word.
Posted by: Blog at October 29, 2004 12:44 PMI wish I had the time to put together blog posts like that again, you lazy college student.
I had the same thought at the time, but was typically more interested in pointlessly blasting headlines. Well done.
BTW, Blog, the NYT keeps stealing writers from Slate, and the Microsoft-owned (probably soon to be Washington Post-owned) online mag could surely pay to send him to Texas. Or Malheur.
Posted by: WWB at October 29, 2004 3:06 PMRegardless, I blame the editor.
Posted by: Blog at October 29, 2004 4:04 PMWell done, FLOG!
Hey Blog: give the editor a break, huh? I'm sure he's pretty busy, what with having to change Wisconsin's color a couple times a day and everything.
Posted by: bryan at October 30, 2004 11:41 AM